Streamlined and FBAR Catch-Up: Which Path Are You Eligible For?

Five questions, one at a time. You'll land on one of five paths: late FBARs, delinquent information returns, Streamlined Foreign Offshore, Streamlined Domestic Offshore, or a conversation with a person. Nothing here asks for an account balance or any other dollar figure, so it can't estimate a penalty and doesn't try. It's general information and routing. It isn't tax advice for your situation.

Five questions

Nothing you enter leaves your browser, and nothing is stored.

Question 1

Has the IRS opened an examination of any of your tax returns, or asked you for returns you have not filed, or are you under investigation by IRS Criminal Investigation?
Where this comes from

IRS: If the IRS has initiated a civil examination of taxpayer's returns for any taxable year, regardless of whether the examination relates to undisclosed foreign financial assets, the taxpayer will not be eligible to use the streamlined procedures. (Streamlined filing compliance procedures)

Your path

What this tool can't see: it reads the published IRS criteria and nothing else, so it can't see the facts an examiner would weigh. US abode and what counts as a civil examination aren't bright lines, and on both of them "I am not sure" is a real answer. The three-year return window and the six-year FBAR window roll every filing season, which is why this page names no specific years. State filing obligations, your Canadian-side filing obligations and the CRA Voluntary Disclosures Program sit outside this tool.

Email me the catch-up document checklist

What a streamlined or late-FBAR package actually needs from you: the account statements, the years, the forms, and the order to do them in.

What FBAR penalty exposure looks like

These are the published limits, not your number. Working out what someone actually faces takes their balances and their history, which is a conversation rather than a form.

  • The statutory ceilings, with their conditions. For a non-willful violation, the amount of any civil penalty imposed under subparagraph (A) shall not exceed $10,000. For a willful one, the maximum penalty under subparagraph (B)(i) shall be increased to the greater of ... (I) $100,000, or (II) 50 percent of the amount determined under subparagraph (D) (31 U.S.C. 5321(a)(5)). Those are ceilings on what an examiner may assess, not a bill.
  • Inflation adjustment. For penalties assessed on or after January 17, 2025, the regulation replaces those figures with $16,536 and $165,353 (31 CFR 1010.821, Table 1). That's still the last column as of the eCFR's July 24, 2026 currency stamp.
  • The reasonable cause exception, in the statute's words. No penalty shall be imposed under subparagraph (A) with respect to any violation if ... (I) such violation was due to reasonable cause, and (II) the amount of the transaction or the balance in the account at the time of the transaction was properly reported. It can take the number to zero. It does not apply to willful violations: for those, the same statute says subparagraph (B)(ii) shall not apply.
  • The counting unit changed after Bittner. The examiner manual now reads: a single non-willful reporting violation can only result in a single penalty, but a single willful reporting violation can result in multiple penalties depending on the number of accounts which were not properly reported. Non-willful counts per report. Per-account counting survives for willful violations only (IRM 4.26.16).
  • Three things in the same manual pull the number down. The non-willful penalty should not be imposed if: The violation was due to reasonable cause, and Accurate delinquent or amended FBAR(s) are filed, rectifying prior violation(s). The manual also caps the total: In no event will the total amount of the penalties for non-willful violations (among all open years) exceed 50 percent of the highest aggregate balance of all foreign financial accounts to which the violations relate for the years under examination. And on the delinquent-filing situation specifically: A penalty will not be asserted for an account if it is determined that the failure to report the account on a timely filed FBAR was not willful, the failure to report the account on a timely-filed FBAR was due to reasonable cause, and the account was properly reported on the delinquent FBAR. Read the words if it is determined. That's internal guidance to examiners, and a filing position you can rely on isn't the same thing.

Want the magnitude question answered properly, in prose, with the hedges attached? That's how FBAR penalty exposure really works.

Common questions

  • What are the Streamlined Procedures? They're a route the IRS publishes for people whose filings were missed honestly. You send in a set number of back years rather than every year you missed, and the IRS says that a taxpayer who is eligible and who follows all of the instructions will not be subject to failure-to-file and failure-to-pay penalties, accuracy-related penalties, information return penalties, or FBAR penalties (IRS). Interest still applies. There are two versions, one for people living outside the US and one for people living in it, and they aren't interchangeable.
  • Why did this send me to a conversation instead of a path? Because something in your answers sits outside what the IRS publishes criteria for. That isn't a verdict on your situation and it usually isn't bad news. It means the published rules stop short of your facts, and guessing on your behalf would be worse than saying so.
  • What does "non-willful" mean, and can this tool tell me if I am? No, and it won't try. The IRS defines it as conduct due to negligence, inadvertence, or mistake or conduct that is the result of a good faith misunderstanding of the requirements of the law (IRS). You certify it yourself, in the first person, under penalties of perjury, on Form 14653. That's a judgement about your own history that no questionnaire can make for you, and anyone telling you otherwise online is overreaching.
  • Why did it ask whether I'm a citizen or a green card holder? Because the IRS publishes two different residence tests and your status decides which one you're measured against. Citizens and green card holders are tested on days spent outside the US. Everyone else is tested on a different rule entirely. Answer that one wrong and the rest of the questions measure you against the wrong standard.
  • It asked about the last three years, but I only just moved. Does that matter? It might work in your favour. The test looks at any one or more of the most recent three years (IRS), not at where you live today. A single qualifying year inside that window can be enough, which is why the question is worded the way it is.
  • What if I wasn't sure about one of my answers? Say so rather than guessing. Several questions offer an "I'm not sure" option and it's a real answer, not a soft no. The published criteria turn on specifics, and a confident wrong answer here is more expensive than an honest uncertain one.
  • Is this advice? No. It's the IRS's published eligibility criteria, asked in order, plus our own published prices. It doesn't know your balances, your account history or your correspondence, and it never asks for a dollar figure, so it can't and doesn't estimate what you might owe. What it can do is tell you which door you're standing in front of.
  • What happens if I get this handled with you? The Cross-Border Assessment is $249 and it credits toward the work if you go ahead. You get a written read on your own file, including the years actually at issue and what the package would involve, before you commit to anything larger.

Know the path, want the file handled?

The Cross-Border Assessment is a flat $249. Sixty minutes with a dual-licensed CPA plus a written summary of your file: what you owe where, what needs filing, and your exact quote. It credits in full toward any engagement.

See the $249 assessment